No road or rail going through the airport either.Īnother interchange that flat doesn't exist in the existing North America scenery. Same interchange, only in the new scenery it is 100% accurate and detailed, outstanding. You can see road and rail going through the airport. A not very close representation of the infrastructure. KICT - Mid Continent airport and infrastructure, existing North America scenery. The new KEQA airport layout I submitted made it in. You can also see the divided hwy going into town. Here is a turnpike off-ramp to the lake and City of El Dorado that doesn't even exist in the old "existing North America scenery". Now on to what we do currently have with this new scenery that is outstanding. Sorry, I have to keep trying to ram the point home. It never did go through the lake.Īgain this is what it should look like with current OSM water body data. This rail line was removed and taken out of service about 10 years ago. This is my own custom scenery taken from v0map and OSM.Įl Dorado Lake south shoreline existing North America scenery. You'll see better example farther on down this post. Only because I am determined to get the accurate water bodies included in this scenery cycle, this is what the lake should look like. Take my word for it, this picture doesn't do it justis. Next gen scenery infrastructure and major waterways are accurate. I know this because I did the most recent editing to it). Now it is as accurate as OSM is, (which in this part of the world is pretty accurate. Pat on the back!Ĭity of El Dorado infrastructure is almost completely fictitious in existing North America scenery. The rivers are also accurate, again, MORE, MORE, MORE! While the water bodies would work, and they fit way better than they did before, because the road network is correct, it sure would be icing on the cake if we can get the OSM or Tiger water bodies incorporated. I could offer to help couldn't I? dbelcham Posts: 58 Joined: Thu 4:55 pmīeautiful job, the roads are superb and they are accurate. Based on the attitudes shown in this thread I have to rescind that offer as I can't risk exposing my good name and reputation with the organizations that I would approach by risking conversations like these between the members of this community and those companies.īut hey.you're right. Funny that nobody here gave two shits to see that offer. I can probably acquire a large number of high powered, virtualized cloud based servers to run the scenery build on. In case you missed my first post, I did offer to help with the project. I'd rather not look at it again thank you. As a result I spent time looking at their code to see if I could easily make some fixes. I have tried my hand at generating scenery using the tool chain in the past. You might understand that I'd rather not continue that work in my spare time. I'm sure that unlike you my day job is to help companies fix their fucked-up code bases. I could write a new scenery generation system for FG.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |